The concept of not thinking one dimensionally was outlined in a previous article:
How do you think in two dimensions? – ARTHUR PSALTIS
This notion is founded on Counterbalanced Thought; an approach that allows an alternative measure to sit distant from typical rules and allows another approach to be enacted when particular circumstances prevail.
My question at the end of this article was “What is required for 3-dimensional thinking?”
The 3rd dimension is created by time. There is no doubt that time influences thinking. Conditions that are time dependent change circumstances, hence alter views, and ultimately impact outcomes. The concept of thinking in 3 dimensions requires consideration of the conditions that exist at a moment in time, and subsequently impact decisions. What was thought to be right previously, may not be appropriate now.
Accepting that the typical approach may not always prevail, and the counterbalanced alternative needs consideration, allows 2 – dimensional thinking. Recognizing that time can change that thinking, provides the 3rd dimension.
These dimensions provide a sound set of guidelines for sound decision making.
Firstly, identify the typical approach, the decision that addresses the primary intent. This approach should suit most circumstances but won’t suit all.
Secondly, consider if extreme circumstances exist, or if the impact of this decision does more damage than good. In this situation a compromise to the norm, or a counterbalanced approach may be required.
Finally, assess the moment in time. What is different now compared to previous, and how does this influence the outcome?
Forming a perspective based on 3 – dimensional thinking is the key to good decision making. It’s only once you consider something in 3 dimensions that you have assessed it fully, with pure clarity.